Last week saw the group I was in present three ideas for our 30 second ad called "Say Something Poltical". In terms of what my ideas were the first one would have been based on the cancellation of EMA, this topic interested me because the EMA system was created for the the purpose of encouraging teenagers to attend college on a regular basis.
Also depending on the income of the parents the teenagers could get between £10-£30 each week which would have paid into their account directly.
However I was then recommended to change the topic as this was deemed not very interesting.
My second idea saw me look into the world of celebrity and our peeping tom society. I feel that over the last few years the media has given us the power to make us feel like celebrities owe us in some way. I then began to look into the rise of the so called "super injunction" which was brought into circulation only a few years ago.
We first heard of the super injunction when Max Mosley requested one to prevent details of his sordid sex life reaching the public domain.
Since then a number of celebrities have taken them out to try and prevent the same situation happening to them, however my question is if a member of the the general public requested one for their own personal reasons would the courts allow it? or would they say no on the grounds of not enough money?
Now my finalised idea sees me look into privacy a bit more deeper as I explore, celeb phone hacking, the exploitation of ongoing murder enquires and what is the true cost of privacy and can everybody afford it.
No comments:
Post a Comment